Artificial intelligence promises a future of remarkable possibility. A 2024 Microsoft Copilot advertisement presented a vision of almost limitless human capability, suggesting that technology can help us achieve whatever we desire. The implicit question in the commercial is intoxicatingly simple: With no boundaries, ‘What do I want to do next?’
Yet there is another set of questions that technology cannot answer: What must I receive today? What kind of wisdom cannot be automated? What forms of excellence still require patience, apprenticeship, and submission to reality? (Those of us participating in school life will immediately jump to education and learning as one example of a form of excellence requiring “patience, apprenticeship, and submission to reality”.)
In his final session Christopher Watkin explored three ways human beings relate to the world.
The first is poiesis (making), where the world becomes raw material to be shaped according to our desires. This outlook is increasingly reflected in AI culture, where flourishing is defined by our ability to generate, optimise, and scale.
The second is mimesis (imitation), where we seek models and ideals to copy. Social media trends such as "looksmaxing" illustrate this instinct, encouraging people to imitate admired forms of beauty, success, or influence.
The third is methexis (participation). Rather than creating reality from scratch or merely copying others, methexis invites us to participate in a reality that precedes us and will continue after us. We are not autonomous creators. We are participants in God's world.
According to Watkin, modern people often oscillate between poiesis and mimesis, attempting to be both sovereign creators and imitators at the same time. The result is a fragmented vision of human flourishing. The biblical alternative is participation.
This distinction is crucial for thinking about AI.